Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:48:45 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: abial@webgiro.com (Andrzej Bialecki), tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Final call for review: Dynamic sysctls. Message-ID: <200007122148.OAA24155@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <1463.963426643@critter.freebsd.dk> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Jul 12, 2000 08:30:43 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Right, but it will be a grave mistake if we just export all sysctls with > SNMP. They look similar, but they are very different. > > If somebody wants to add *real* SNMP to the kernel, MIB-II and similar, > we can probably arrange for sysctl to be a vehicle for that, but sysctl > covers more territory than SNMP does. SNMP covers "all that which can be examined or modified". How are sysctl's not _all_ a subset of this? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007122148.OAA24155>