Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Jul 2000 07:50:27 -0500
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com>
To:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce?
Message-ID:  <20000727075027.C8974@hamlet.nectar.com>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>; from jdp@polstra.com on Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700
References:  <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line
> option to relax the constraints.  And an rc.conf knob could be added
> to control whether or not it was strict at boot time.

I like this option, but the knob should be compile-time, IMHO.
--
Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000727075027.C8974>