Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:40:13 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How much security should ldconfig enforce? Message-ID: <20000727094013.T17222@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20000727075027.C8974@hamlet.nectar.com>; from n@nectar.com on Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 07:50:27AM -0500 References: <XFMail.000726193613.jdp@polstra.com> <20000727075027.C8974@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.com> [000727 05:50] wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 07:36:13PM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > > 3. It could default to strictly secure but accept a command-line > > option to relax the constraints. And an rc.conf knob could be added > > to control whether or not it was strict at boot time. > > I like this option, but the knob should be compile-time, IMHO. Compile time options died in the early 90's dude. :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000727094013.T17222>