Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 20:14:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/bktr bktr_os.c src/sys/dev/md md.c src/sys/fs/devfs devfs.h devfs_devs.c devfs_vfsops.c devfs_vnops.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/i4b/driver i4b_ctl.c i4b_rbch.c i4b_tel.c i4b_trace.c ... Message-ID: <200008210214.UAA35416@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2000 14:34:39 PDT." <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200008202134.OAA42108@freefall.freebsd.org> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : Add devfs cloning to: : disk minilayer (ie: ad(4), sd(4), cd(4) etc etc) Why bother with sd? Shouldn't that be da? : md(4), tun(4), bpf(4), fd(4) ... : Add commented out DEVFS to GENERIC Question: Is this DEVFS interrupt context safe? The old DEVFS didn't deal well with devices arriving in an interrupt context, which CAM does. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008210214.UAA35416>