Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 17:53:59 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is it time yet? [was Re: Weak symbols] Message-ID: <20000821175359.C26324@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000821124253.24400A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>; from eischen@vigrid.com on Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:50:24PM -0400 References: <20000821105919.A25903@hamlet.nectar.com> <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000821124253.24400A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:50:24PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I think this is a good idea, but should we also fix our internal > calls of foo() to _foo()? Yes, if `foo' has external linkage. > You also have to think about the threads library, both current and > future. We have to be able to build libc_r, and want in the future to > be able to build libpthread that can be linked with libc. Can you go into more detail here? Is there something special to do for libc_r? Thanks! -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000821175359.C26324>