Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 11:07:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/games/fortune/datfiles fortunes Message-ID: <200008231707.LAA12343@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <200008231704.LAA02617@billy-club.village.org> References: <200008231651.KAA12190@nomad.yogotech.com> <200008231604.KAA11402@nomad.yogotech.com> <20000814003636.A74639@pavilion.net> <200008140753.AAA08038@netplex.com.au> <20000819124824.E88550@lucifer.bart.nl> <20000822161835.B807@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000823091714.D650@pavilion.net> <200008231648.KAA02382@billy-club.village.org> <200008231704.LAA02617@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Both true. And both problems today. We won't have the TOPS-20 > version numbering where you'd have numbers like > 5.0(123) > 5.1(345) > 5.2(9534) > 6.0(23) > > Also, I don't see a functional difference between DATE-NUMBER and just > NUMBER, especially since it isn't in the CVS tree. However, a GMT > date down to the second as a change number id, then that would make > checking out from CVS to that point possible. That would be cool. Actually, a GMT date would be adequate for me, instead of using a number, since that makes things really easy from a CVS point of view. I'd actually prefer that to a number, for the reasons mentioned. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008231707.LAA12343>