Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:00:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), marcel@cup.hp.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IBM JDK fails due to lack of SA_SIGINFO support Message-ID: <200009061700.LAA28404@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <14774.29608.353021.688597@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <14773.43466.744621.411519@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200009060447.WAA23183@nomad.yogotech.com> <14774.29608.353021.688597@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Currently the IBM jdk & jvm don't run under our linux abi. This had > > > previously been attributed to the "sigaltstack: Cannot allocate > > > memory" message one sees when running it. Upon further investigation, > > > this appears to be a red herring. > > > > Umm, I'd believe this except that someone sent me a patch (which I've > > forwarded to Marcel) that fixes this and is related to the sigalstack > > error above. At least the author of the patch claims that the IBM JDK > > now runs successfully on his box, running some version of FreeBSD. :) > > Perhaps he's using a different version of the IBM java stuff? I'm > using the "IBMJava2-SDK-13.tgz" that I downloaded last week. On a > linux box, (where I can actually get version info) : Possibly. > > Hmm, I'm at a loss. I've heard that things work fine with the > > signalstack issues fixed, so maybe the java program that he is running > > doesn't tickle the bug, although I find that rather difficult to believe > > given that almost every Java program known to man is multi-threaded. > > Maybe IBM moved to using SA_SIGINFO handlers for their thread > coordination? Maybe. I'm just the man in the middle. :( Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009061700.LAA28404>