Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:44:51 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review: restructuring of per-uid resource limits Message-ID: <20000906214451.C58347@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <200009052216.PAA25991@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>; from Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 03:16:21PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009060505100.25034-100000@besplex.bde.org> <200009052216.PAA25991@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000906 02:00], Don Lewis (Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com) wrote: >On Sep 6, 5:11am, Bruce Evans wrote: >} Perhaps there should be several levels of KASSERTs, with at >} least one level where the sanity checks are not mandatory (like the >} current default of INVARIANTS not defined). > >That sounds good to me. Having to change the sense of the test to >convert between "if (...) panic" and KASSERT as well as the other >syntax changes basically sucks. Look at the CONDSPLASSERT(9) manpage. It has different characteristics depending on a sysctl value. It hope I understood what you two meant, otherwise excuse my intrusion. :) -- Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>; Abandon hope, all ye who enter here... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000906214451.C58347>