Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 00:26:06 -0700 From: "Crist J . Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>, Heredity Choice <stork@QNET.COM>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unix 2000... Message-ID: <20000930002606.Q81242@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:00:01PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10009290255390.28516-100000@cello.qnet.com> <20000929.13432900@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <xzp7l7v9wvi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 03:00:01PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it> writes: > > I seem to understand that the process is far from completion. The > > difficulties on the part of M$ clearly show that NT is decidedly not > > the right tool for the job. If they are bent on wasting time (and > > money) on this project, then so be it. > > AFAIK, they're transitioning to Windows 2000, not NT. Yup. Looks like they are really doing it this time. The chatter at the last BAFUG was that they have pretty much replaced the FreeBSD-Apache machines. Anyone care to whack at the site to see what servers are responding? ;) Here are some news articles, but they are all about two months old. http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article/0,,3_428711,00.html http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2610894,00.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/1/12290.html http://www.bsdtoday.com/2000/August/Newswire24 http://www.ugeek.com/news/geeknews/q22000/gee2000803002036.htm -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000930002606.Q81242>