Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2000 21:06:26 +0100 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/apsfilter Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/print/apsfilter/scripts configure Message-ID: <20001223210626.E1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <20001223135503.A72273@elvis.mu.org>; from billf@mu.org on Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 01:55:03PM -0600 References: <200012231328.eBNDS4Y67614@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001223122211.Y72273@elvis.mu.org> <20001223194942.A92298@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <20001223203235.A1011@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20001223135503.A72273@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Bill Fumerola (billf@mu.org): > > Isn't a repo-copy needed? > > I think so. > Of course not. Please try and follow along with whats going on. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/print/apsfilter/ Well - in this case I'm just curious: Why not? on the URL above I see history: apsfilter 5.x -> some 5.x releases -> 6.0 the apsfilter6 history is different: apsfilter 5.x -> apsfilter 6 devel (i.e. the migration from 5.x to 6.x) -> 6.0 In my eyes the latter one would be a better history path. So, why is the first one better? Alex -- cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001223210626.E1011>