Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:13:32 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> To: opentrax@email.com Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24307: man page for inetd(8) missing /etc/protocols in FIL ES section Message-ID: <20010115031332.A61857@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com>; from opentrax@email.com on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800 References: <200101150853.f0F8r4Q01821@mobile.wemm.org> <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote: > > There is no need. There is no point adding a '/etc/protocols' to the FILES > > list since inetd does not use the '/etc/protocols' file. At best it would > > be misinformation. > > > Wait. How is this misinformation? I must be missing something. Because /etc/protocols doesn't have to exist, could be wrong, etc and it doesn't make a difference to inetd, because it _does not use it_. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010115031332.A61857>