Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:47:07 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenSSL ASM patch Message-ID: <20010211124707.S3274@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:28:02PM -0800 References: <20010211094946.A51308@mollari.cthul.hu> <20010211122802.A78975@mollari.cthul.hu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> [010211 12:32] wrote: > Updated patch now available at the same location. Changes: > > * Document the MACHINE_CPU types which are currently used > > * Make NOPERL mutually exclusive with OpenSSL ASM and document it > > * Teach make(1) about MACHINE_CPU and provide sensible defaults for > i386 and alpha. > > http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/openssl-asm.patch > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you say this gives us a 3-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed and ported to -stable ASAP. Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate routines? Or must it all be choosen at compile time? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010211124707.S3274>