Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 23:00:56 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: bright@wintelcom.net (Alfred Perlstein) Cc: mij@osdn.com (Jim Mock), steveo@eircom.net (Steve O'Hara-Smith), arch@FreeBSD.ORG, jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org (j mckitrick), jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More BETA evilness Re: BETA induced nervousness Message-ID: <200103162300.QAA17472@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <20010316134113.I29888@fw.wintelcom.net> from "Alfred Perlstein" at Mar 16, 2001 01:41:13 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> FYI I'm fighting this cause on the -arch list, I've just quoted > this message and added cc's to the people who have the authority > to fix it. > > I want to be clear that it's not just me that's irritated by this. > > My current solution is instead of -BETA have -STABLE-RC, the > '-RC' is there to give knowledgeable people a heads-up and > the '-STABLE' is prominent enough to reduce the amount of > concern. [...] > > > ---------------------- > > > DO NOT PANIC - BETA is a normal phase that STABLE goes through prior > > > to the rolling of a release. If anything it is *MORE* stable than > > > usual during BETA as all changes are monitered by the release > > > engineer. > > > ---------------------- ??? -STABLE++ -MORE-STABLE -METASTABLE Heh. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103162300.QAA17472>