Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:42:06 -0700 From: Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson <insane@lunatic.oneinsane.net> To: FreeBSD-chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Just an observation - MUA's seen in the lists Message-ID: <20010413074206.A35752@lunatic.oneinsane.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104131309160.90249-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com>; from kris@catonic.net on Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:10:51PM %2B0000 References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010413000646.00cca610@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104131309160.90249-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kirby (kris@catonic.net) wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Brett Glass wrote:
> > It's OK to use an unreliable machine for your MUA, just so long as
> > your mission-critical data is backed up on a machine running a
> > RELIABLE operating system!
>
> Hey! Wait a minute! Email *is* mission-critical. When was the last time
> you went without email for a few days? :-)
>
I would like to see a Windows based Email program try to open a mailbox
with 500 messages (threaded). ;-)
Some of us archive our mail for reference when we can't get online ;-)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user said ...
The InSaNe One rm -rf *
insane@oneinsane.net and all was /dev/null and *void()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most
-- Ozzy Ozbourne
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010413074206.A35752>