Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 May 2001 04:12:03 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        brad.knowles@skynet.be (Brad Knowles)
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert), jkh@osd.bsdi.com (Jordan Hubbard), jessemonroy@email.com, jessem@livecam.com, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Concern over ftp.freebsd.org
Message-ID:  <200105040412.VAA20118@usr06.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <p05100300b717865e0dc1@[10.0.1.2]> from "Brad Knowles" at May 04, 2001 12:20:29 AM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >  I also believe that this is a legitimate topic for -hackers,
> >  since code which can not be obtained, can not be the subject
> >  of active developement.
> 
> 	There I have to disagree.  This subject is applicable to all of 
> FreeBSD as it is to any one particular mailing list, and therefore 
> the most suitable mailing list for this discussion is -chat.

Most people do not subscribe to chat.  The most applicable
mailing list is probably the one with the largest subscribership...


> >  As someone who uses FreeBSD in a business context, and has off
> >  and on since 1993, it is alarming to go out and try to grab a
> >  distribution, only to find out that it's not where you expected
> >  it to be.
> 
> 	Surely it's on the mirrors, yes?

No, it's not.

> >  It's also extremely alarming to find out that the official
> >  mirrors have mirrored the disappearance.
> 
> 	Really?  This is the first I had heard of this.  Could you elaborate?

See other posting.

> >  I personally only found out as a result of attempting to build
> >  a release locally, only to have it fail to retrieve two of the
> >  35 ports distribution files needed to perform that operation.
> >
> >  When this happened, it seriously underscored the degree to which
> >  the FreeBSD project depends on good faith effort by agencies not
> >  under the projects direct control (as Linux depends on the good
> >  faith and continued existance of Linus and those lieutenants who
> >  hold the keys to the non-repository maintained source tree).
> 
> 	It would seem to me that this would be precisely the sort of 
> thing that would be most resistant to having the central repository 
> disappear (or otherwise be unavailable).  Could you help me 
> understand how this sort of thing could happen, and how the problem 
> might be addressed?

This has to do with programs -- with specific versions -- on which
release tagged builds depend.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105040412.VAA20118>