Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 09:43:00 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org>, Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc Message-ID: <20010510094300.C4494@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200105092021.f49KLdT99914@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:21:39PM -0700 References: <200105090803.f49833B84293@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <200105092021.f49KLdT99914@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:21:39PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > :> brian 2001/05/09 00:24:47 PDT > :> > :> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > :> etc rc > :> Log: > :> Remove sockets as well as regular files in /var/run and /var/spool/lock > :> at boot time. This restores the pre-4.3 behaviour. > :> > :> Revision Changes Path > :> 1.212.2.25 +2 -2 src/etc/rc > : > :I think maybe this should just remove everything ? Comments ? > : > :-- > :Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org> > > Yes. /var/run should be wiped completely. Programs needing > persistent /var storage should use /var/db. That's why we have > a /var/db separate from a /var/run. Just as an aside, irrelevant to the whole /etc/rc discussion: does this mean that the security/sudo port should keep its tty tickets in /var/db/sudo, not /var/run/sudo as it currently does? Or are those also meant to expire at shutdown? Moved to -ports, CC'd to Michael Haro as the sudo port maintainer. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence every third, but it still comprehensible. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010510094300.C4494>