Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 11:10:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: bright@wintelcom.net Cc: bsddiy@163.net, kris@obsecurity.org, grog@lemis.com, tlambert@primenet.com, mckusick@mckusick.com, ru@FreeBSD.org, fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: [kris@obsecurity.org: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc] Message-ID: <200105151510.f4FFABt62656@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20010514225533.M2009@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[cvs-lists removed from CC] On 14 May, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Assuming your database is a serious production quality system it will > implement its own style of data integrity and consistancy checking > on top of the filesystems in case it happens to crash. Is not this a slightly wrong attitude? Why does a serious production quality database needs its own checking for problems, which can only be come from OS if it runs on a serisous production quality OS? -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105151510.f4FFABt62656>