Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:15:53 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org> Cc: mjacob@feral.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MBUF locking- this can't be right, can it? Message-ID: <20010613141553.A9050@technokratis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010614.031206.85718093.ume@mahoroba.org>; from ume@mahoroba.org on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 03:12:06AM %2B0900 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106131033130.40934-100000@beppo.feral.com> <20010613134251.A8764@technokratis.com> <20010614.031206.85718093.ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 03:12:06AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:42:51 -0400 > >>>>> Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> said: > > bmilekic> Yes, I certainly didn't write that. I think it was KAME. > > Yup, current KAME is based on 4.3-RELEASE which doesn't have > mtx_lock() issue. It is my mistake during merging it into 5-CURRENT. > The fix looks good to me. If there is no objection, I'll commit it. Nope, no objection here. :-) Regards, -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@technokratis.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010613141553.A9050>