Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:26:50 -0400 From: Omachonu Ogali <missnglnk@informationwave.net> To: "Nathan Vidican" <nathan@vidican.com> Cc: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of PicoBSD Message-ID: <20010615102650.A2333@subtopia.informationwave.net> In-Reply-To: <000401c0f5a6$d760b770$6700000a@78lb019>; from nathan@vidican.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0400 References: <200106151314.f5FDEPo08741@mail.ipsnetwork.net> <20010615101216.A2201@subtopia.informationwave.net> <000401c0f5a6$d760b770$6700000a@78lb019>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:24:09AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote: > I know of people running PicoBSD built from FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE sources, as > well as 4.3-RELEASE, so it shouldn't be broken? You'll need the FreeBSD > source-code on a machine mounted to /usr/src, in order to build picobsd. This is what concerns me: $ ls -la /usr/src/release/picobsd/build/build ls: /usr/src/release/picobsd/build/build: No such file or directory And after taking a look at the CVS tree, it seems the build script was checked into the attic, is there now a new way of building PicoBSD? > Nathan Vidican > Nathan@Vidican.com > http://Nathan.Vidican.com/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Omachonu Ogali" <missnglnk@informationwave.net> > To: <nathan@vidican.com> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:12 AM > Subject: Re: State of PicoBSD > > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:14:25AM -0400, Nathan Vidican wrote: > > > > Out of curiousity, what's the current state of PicoBSD? > > > > -- > > > > Omachonu Ogali > > > > missnglnk@informationwave.net > > > > http://www.informationwave.net > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > The 'status' could be summed up as fairly complete I'd say. For the most > > > part, PicoBSD users are using it for some custom purpose. You can build > > > your own copy of PicoBSD using just about any post 3.0 release of > > > FreeBSD with the sources currently commited to the tree. I've been told > > > it can be done with 2.X branches as well, but have never tried to > > > personally. > > > In summation, I'd have to say that it's complete; as complete as it > > > will be for now. Like the standard release of FreeBSD, improvements, and > > > additions will most likely continue onward in the future... but PicoBSD > > > is definetly alive and doing well as-is. > > > > Well, I wanted to know if it was broken or working in -STABLE, > > because it looks like it's broken to me in -CURRENT. > > > > > -- > > > Nathan Vidican > > > Nathan@Vidican.com > > > http://Nathan.Vidic > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message > > > > -- > > Omachonu Ogali > > missnglnk@informationwave.net > > http://www.informationwave.net > > > > -- Omachonu Ogali missnglnk@informationwave.net http://www.informationwave.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615102650.A2333>