Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 19:08:20 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include Makefile Message-ID: <20010617190820.B49931@bohr.physics.purdue.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106172008350.99850-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:24:54PM %2B1000 References: <20010617080851.E484339E9@overcee.netplex.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106172008350.99850-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 08:24:54PM +1000, Bruce Evans (bde@zeta.org.au) wrote: > These seem to be actually the well behaved packages. __FreeBSD_version > seems to be documented only in /usr/share/examples/FreeBSD_version/, > and only <osreldate.h> is mentioned there. <osreldate.h> is less evil > than <sys/param.h>. Why? Why have a nonstandard header file containing only __FreeBSD_version? What's wrong with putting that in sys/param.h? The documentation, of course, should either be fixed to reflect use of sys/param.h or to put your answer why not. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010617190820.B49931>