Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:23:43 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libedit replacement for libreadline Message-ID: <20010718002343.A30891@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20010716013127.A16058@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010716103351.A81876@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20010716031932.A5930@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101004b77a150da1f1@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717094027.A78232@xor.obsecurity.org> <p05101007b77a2351f9de@[128.113.24.47]> <20010717102713.A79329@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:27:14 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:23:44PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> > Okay. So it sounds like there's a "shim" to libedit which would be
> > the API replacement for libreadline. Could we call that something
> > cute like 'libreadlinele' ('le' for 'libedit') or 'libeditrl', but
> > leave libreadline as a separate port?
>
> How about 'libedit'? :) I could live with that; it's just some
> makefile changes.
I vote this too. We don't need stripped down libreadline under
'libreadline' name pretend to be full version (f.e. for autoconf, etc.)
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
iQCVAwUBO1Sez+JgpPLZnQjrAQGPHwQA4fCduHWSRixE9IhxWo5zCFLHHfdD0o0U
/8ArHh7064STIrfY0PEEUXej2Z1tGMCTMo0wqO85xYnOZhm8Me5WGztiyIsY0gDr
FdW5AMeeY3n4FxeuPzelaLgaxALfsHLRhkJjmj5EAhiRe47CGAsazx9uXUWevJ+I
05mooA1pq58=
=cCEI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010718002343.A30891>