Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:55:49 +1000 From: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au> To: Lamont Granquist <lamont@scriptkiddie.org> Cc: "A. L. Meyers" <a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <200107230055.KAA05691@lightning.itga.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:27:01 -0700.
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> you should expect to > occasionally see problems. People will break the build. People will have > insufficiently tested their code and subsystems will break. And CVS itself is not atomic, so there is always the possibility of you grabbing a version half-way through a series of related and interdependent commits. There is no obvious way of fixing this that will still scale to the sort of load that the FreeBSD CVS system has to support. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107230055.KAA05691>