Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:40:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com>; from kc5vdj@yahoo.com on Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:03:29PM -0500 References: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:03:29PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > Why is csh tcsh? > > There are differences... > > 4:52:48pm wahoo(6): cmp /bin/csh /bin/tcsh > 4:59:12pm wahoo(7): tcsh is the newer version of csh. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7hb6CWry0BWjoQKURAr6jAJ9WRSE4Dj0aR1HKwNGLb8JNXwtQUwCfd3lz Sww62LNmhHZCIH8hdOmrDgE= =laS3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010823194003.C5214>