Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:46:00 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org> To: kc5vdj@yahoo.com Cc: kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010824094600W.jkh@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com> References: <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com> <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:23:01 -0500 > Because of certain differences, it cannot be used wholesale as a > replacement for csh. Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention. This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up with any concrete differences that would cause harm, so the deed was done. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824094600W.jkh>