Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:46:00 -0700
From:      Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org>
To:        kc5vdj@yahoo.com
Cc:        kris@obsecurity.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why is csh tcsh?  This can be a bad thing...
Message-ID:  <20010824094600W.jkh@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com>
References:  <3B857DB1.2050904@yahoo.com> <20010823194003.C5214@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B85C895.6020602@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jim Bryant <kc5vdj@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh?  This can be a bad thing...
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 22:23:01 -0500

> Because of certain differences, it cannot be used wholesale as a
> replacement for csh.

Then please enumerate them so that they can be given due attention.
This is exactly the sort of detailed feedback that was requested when
we first raised the issue of switching over, and nobody could come up
with any concrete differences that would cause harm, so the deed was
done.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824094600W.jkh>