Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:21:25 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Oliver Fromme <olli@secnetix.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why is csh tcsh? This can be a bad thing... Message-ID: <20010827012122.A25340@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com> References: <20010826015413.C92548@dragon.nuxi.com> <200108261120.NAA07025@lurza.secnetix.de> <20010826154728.A19673@nagual.pp.ru> <3B8966C8.46BD4F84@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 14:14:48 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > While we may be stuck with this bait-and-switch "upgrade", I > think his complaints are not co easily addressed. Certainly, > the "exec" complaint remains valid, in any case: it's a bug > that csh didn't have. Complaints _are_ easily addressed, tcsh author is responsible and fix all thing that I report to him. If you complain about 'upgrade' problem, i.e. we don't have latest tcsh, ask our tcsh maintainer for upgrade. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010827012122.A25340>