Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 18:45:33 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-01:58.lpd Message-ID: <20010830184533.C27546@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <p05101003b7b46478cf15@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:57:59PM -0400 References: <20010830153246.K69164-100000@mail.wlcg.com> <p05101002b7b44cbd3f34@[128.113.24.47]> <20010830142340.A15795@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <p05101003b7b46478cf15@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:57:59PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > [actually, I almost think that lpd should default to "secure" operation, > and require someone to specify some startup flag if they DO want to > accept remote print jobs, but that is probably too dramatic of a change. > I also don't know how these flags would interact with the popular > alternatives to the standard lpr/lpd, such as lprNG...] I think that would be a reasonable thing to do at least in 5.0. Kris --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7juw9Wry0BWjoQKURAvtcAKDeq2/0f5zwgu7xeG5ohS7VJJnw7wCgvB/P 8+3PYtc4r6KOS2aLoEAsUaE= =q2Aw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Yylu36WmvOXNoKYn-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010830184533.C27546>