Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 15:07:47 +0200 From: Herbert <herbert@bugat.at> To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ICQ with NAT problems Message-ID: <20011021150747.A23735@freebsd2.rocks> In-Reply-To: <3BD2B8ED.7020404@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 10:00:45PM %2B1000 References: <3BD21435.4060605@quake.com.au> <3BD2538D.80604@quake.com.au> <20011021121329.E78028@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> <3BD2B8ED.7020404@quake.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hei! I had a similar problem with licq. After adding the following rules to my ipf config the continous disconnections stopped: pass in log quick on xl0 proto udp from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 4000 to any (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = 205.188.153.[97..102]) Removing the lines, the problem returns. IPF was blocking udp packets from mirabilis: 21/10/2001 15:00:39.249682 2x xl0 @0:10 b 205.188.153.102,4000 -> 192.168.xx.xxx,49169 PR udp len 20 13568 IN Any comments? Anyone got socks5 working with licq? May I see your configuration? Thx! Regards, Herbert * Kal Torak (kaltorak@quake.com.au) [011021 14:45]: > H wrote: > > > Just to back you up: I see the same behaviour (that is, I get complaints > > from others about going offline/online very regularly). But I always > > thought it was my Licq acting strange. > > > > I'd like to see this problem solved too. > > > Nope, definatly a nat issue... > > I have seen this happen with licq, micq and versions of offical icq up to > 99b (I havent tried any more recent versions)... When directly connected > there is no problem, its just when going through nat! > > Glad Im not crazy, see there are other people seeing the same thing! :P To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011021150747.A23735>