Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 00:09:21 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Step5, pam_opie OPIE auth fix for review Message-ID: <200201210009.g0L09Lt34943@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <xzpr8ok1sl6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> ; from Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> "21 Jan 2002 01:00:05 %2B0100." References: <xzpr8ok1sl6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> writes: > > In any case, if I understand what you're trying to do, it can be done > > by returning PAM_SUCCESS if OPIE authentication succeeded, PAM_IGNORE > > if it failed but Unix authentication is still allowed, and > > PAM_AUTH_ERR if OPIE failed and Unix authentication is *not* allowed. > > In that case, if you mark pam_opie "sufficient", pam_unix will run > > only if OPIE authentication failed but allowed Unix authentication to > > proceed. > > Hmm, actually, that won't do. I need to think this over some more. The usual route is YES or NO, with IGNORE reserved for modules which have no authentication (like say, pam_motd, which prints /etc/motd during the pam_session_open() phase). IGNORE may have other uses, but I can't remember them offhand. M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200201210009.g0L09Lt34943>