Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:37:36 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, will@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Message-ID: <20020211123735.GA93782@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <20020211122615.GU82640@squall.waterspout.com> References: <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc> <200202110319.g1B3JPu09732@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20020211122615.GU82640@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:26:15AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:18:53PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open
> Systems Group wrote:
> > In message <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc>, "Jacques
> > A. Vidrine" writes:
>
> I don't seem to remember getting this email, but...
Possibly because your mailer agent inserts `Mail-Followup-To'
headers that do not include you:
Mail-Followup-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>,
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>,
Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
> In any case, intentionally putting a port in CVS for only a short
> period is a waste either way since one could just as easily
> request testers via the mailing list and this would work just
> as well.
I'm sorry, but I disagree. For ports with potentially complex
relationships with other software, a `-beta' port is just what the
doctor ordered.
Cheers,
--
Jacques A. Vidrine <n@nectar.cc> http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020211123735.GA93782>