Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 02:45:43 -0800 (PST) From: Hiten Pandya <hitmaster2k@yahoo.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, BOUWSMA Beery <freebsd-user@dcf77-zeit.netscum.dyndns.dk> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-ID: <20020311104543.26176.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020311002534.A9838@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > As you are no doubt aware there are significant infrastructural > changes in -current relating to SMP scalability. It's in a very > interim state at the moment, and one of the downsides is increased > interrupt latency and lock contention for certain operations (yes, > audio playback is one of them). > > Basically, it's a known issue. Yep. I agree with Kris, as this issue was discussed in the -current list somewhere. And also, I have been running CURRENT for a while now (around 7/8 months), and it has been going pretty smoothly in the tasks I do. I use mpg123, and xamp for a while with CURRENT and although there are lock issues, but they will be solved by either me, or someone else who can do it. (as I am running an SMP test CURRENT system) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311104543.26176.qmail>