Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:25:04 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: curthread vs. passing thread pointers around Message-ID: <20020329202504.GZ93885@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <72088.1017431691@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20020329194158.GX93885@elvis.mu.org> <72088.1017431691@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> [020329 11:55] wrote: > In message <20020329194158.GX93885@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > >* John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [020329 11:32] wrote: > >> During a discussion on the smp@ list about changes to the suser() > >> API to make use of td_ucred, [...] > > On a related note: I intend to change the open/close/ioctl interface > to device drivers from a "struct thread *" to a "struct ucred *". What about people (ab)?using the device driver interface for proc related stuff? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020329202504.GZ93885>