Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:42:19 +0200 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org>, Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1019525830.931e6a@mired.org>, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Bob Bomar <bulldog@fxp.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: overclocking and freebsd Message-ID: <20020421214219.GA4662@lpt.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: <20020419080009.L30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20020418110814.A64286@lpt.ens.fr> <20020418053829.X96787-100000@pogo.caustic.org> <20020419080009.L30474@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It doesn't on OS X. It cycles through active *applications*, not > windows. Which is a real pain in the butt. Ideally there would be another hotkey combination to cycle through windows related to the application. But cycling in a fixed sequence rather than using a "stack" -- *that* is a pain in the butt. > That, and the fact that only 'minimised' windows appear in the dock is > my pet OS X peeve. . . How customizable is OS X? Suppose I don't like the aqua interface, can I elect to run rootless X with my favourite window manager, not have aqua at all, but still have access to OS X applications when I want (start them up via the command line, or something)? Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020421214219.GA4662>