Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 May 2002 09:03:08 -0400
From:      Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
To:        Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Advanced Networking Question
Message-ID:  <20020506090308.A20367@blackhelicopters.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020506124528.GA7841@submonkey.net>; from setantae@submonkey.net on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:45:28PM %2B0100
References:  <20020506124528.GA7841@submonkey.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, it's incorrect.

You might say, "in a similar manner to a bridge."

I also really dislike the capitalization of Bridge.

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 01:45:28PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> >From the Advanced Networking chapter of the Handbook :
> 
>       <title>Dual Homed Hosts</title>
>       <indexterm><primary>dual homed hosts</primary></indexterm>	        
>       <para>There is one other type of configuration that we should cover, and
> 	that is a host that sits on two different networks. Technically, any
> 	machine functioning as a gateway (in the example above, using a PPP
> 	connection) counts as a dual-homed host.  But the term is really only
> 	used to refer to a machine that sits on two local-area
> 	networks.</para>
> 	  
>       <para>In one case, the machine has two Ethernet cards, each having an
> 	address on the separate subnets.  Alternately, the machine may only
> 	have one Ethernet card, and be using &man.ifconfig.8; aliasing.  The former is
> 	used if two physically separate Ethernet networks are in use, the
> 	latter if there is one physical network segment, but two logically
> 	separate subnets.</para>
> 	  
>       <para>Either way, routing tables are set up so that each subnet knows
> 	that this machine is the defined gateway (inbound route) to the other
> 	subnet.  This configuration, with the machine acting as a Bridge <=====
> 	between the two subnets, is often used when we need to implement
> 	packet filtering or firewall security in either or both
> 	directions.</para>
> 
> Now I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that routing was a layer
> 3 function, and bridging was layer two, so isn't the statement that the machine
> is acting as a bridge incorrect (since it also states that the machine is doing
> routing) ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ceri
> 
> -- 
> get the cool shoe shine
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message

-- 
Michael Lucas		mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/q/Big_Scary_Daemons

           Absolute BSD:   http://www.nostarch.com/abs_bsd.htm

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020506090308.A20367>