Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 May 2002 01:16:13 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>
To:        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r/uthread Makefile.inc uthread_autoinit.c uthread_autoinit.cc
Message-ID:  <20020511081613.GG90188@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <200205110813.g4B8Dgo23554@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200205110813.g4B8Dgo23554@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> [020511 01:13] wrote:
> alfred      2002/05/11 01:13:42 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     lib/libc_r/uthread   Makefile.inc 
>   Added files:
>     lib/libc_r/uthread   uthread_autoinit.c 
>   Removed files:
>     lib/libc_r/uthread   uthread_autoinit.cc 
>   Log:
>   Use GCC's __attribute__ ((constructor)) mechanism to invoke the pthread
>   startup code rather than a static C++ object since c++ seems to be broken.
>   
>   This doesn't seem to work for staticically linked program just yet, I'll
>   give that some more work when I get a chance.
>   
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.31      +1 -1      src/lib/libc_r/uthread/Makefile.inc
>   1.1       +61 -0     src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_autoinit.c (new)
>   1.4       +0 -89     src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_autoinit.cc (dead)

Something is bizarro wrt __weak_reference and static linking, anyone
have any ideas?



-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020511081613.GG90188>