Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 18:24:24 +0200 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: GCC bugs (was: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include atomic.h) Message-ID: <20020512162424.GM30437@cicely5.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20020512161042.GB52586@leviathan.inethouston.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0205121609411.25203-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20020513020240.M10195-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20020512161042.GB52586@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 11:10:42AM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 02:08:31AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Sun, 12 May 2002, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > > > > And if the bug you are seeing, *any* bug you are seeing, with GCC 3.1 > > > or later is a regression from *any* previous version of GCC, please > > > drop me a note and I will upgrade the priority of your PR so that it > > > has highest chance of being fixed for GCC 3.1.1 or GCC 3.2. > > > > Do efficiency bugs count? makeworld is about 50% slower with gcc-3.1 > > than with gcc-2.9x. > > > Is that because you can't make with -j or comparing old make > buildworld to new make buildworld without -j ? I also see increased time on alpha. About 5 hours instead of just about 3 hours as usual. Build is done always without -j and on the same machine and OS. Not that it's important to me - I just noticed. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020512162424.GM30437>