Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:12:50 +1000 From: Joshua Goodall <joshua@roughtrade.net> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ALTQ integration developer preview Message-ID: <20020519001249.GA24012@roughtrade.net> In-Reply-To: <3CE6D592.DCF73743@mindspring.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10205170216500.29826-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205171056200.2091-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <3CE55A9B.73EA3DE4@mindspring.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205181018300.10011-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <3CE61675.BCE2A9E1@mindspring.com> <1021717195.1466.4.camel@gurney.reilly.home> <3CE6D592.DCF73743@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 03:28:34PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > No. TCP. RPC over UDP is really a silly idea. If you need > reliable delivery, then don't use a protocol with "unreliable" > as the first word of it's name. 8-). UDP may well be perfectly viable as a RPC transport, but Terry's misinforming statement is not a good justification. UDP is the User Datagram Protocol. Joshua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020519001249.GA24012>