Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 16:43:21 +0000 From: Baldur Gislason <baldur@foo.is> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My friends were amazed at FreeBSD... Message-ID: <20020524164329.A7AF52744@tesla.foo.is> In-Reply-To: <20020524150005.A67875@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20020524143036.C67484@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20020524164101.P51722-100000@muheleja.eenet.ee> <20020524150005.A67875@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Netscape 4.6 was FreeBSD native, Linux binary compatibility works fine for most programs, but of course native is nicer ;) Baldur On Friday 24 May 2002 14:00, you wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:43:49PM +0300, Imre Oolberg wrote: > | Hi! > | > | By the way, being a admirerer of FreeBSD i got a following question, is > | there any good browser for FreeBSD which doest expect system to have > | Linux emu? Netscape, Mozilla, Opera the all need that emu? > > Some time ago, there was a native FreeBSD Netscape. I believe it was > around version 4.5 or so. It didn't do well with plugins, but it was > nice to have because it didn't need Linux emulation. I finally caved > under the pressure, installed Linux compatibility, and now I don't worry > about it any more. It's worth having Java, RealPlayer, and Flash > without any problems. > > > jm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020524164329.A7AF52744>