Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 01:43:53 -0700 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: George Reid <george.reid@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, pgreen <polytarp@m-net.arbornet.org>, Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss Message-ID: <20020527014353.B1951@HAL9000.wox.org> In-Reply-To: <3CF1CD8C.C3262181@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Sun, May 26, 2002 at 11:09:16PM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0205261919370.49175-100000@m-net.arbornet.org> <3CF17486.F06F3E6A@mindspring.com> <20020527005647.A50028@FreeBSD.org> <3CF1CD8C.C3262181@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>: > If you could provide a proof for Goedel's Theorem, it wouldn't > be "Goedel's Theorem", it would be "Goedel's Law". > > Feel free to provide the counter example originally requested. It > would be amusing to see someone find a way to discredit Goedel's > Theorem on a "-chat" mailing list. Eh? What's wrong with Godel's proof for Godel's Theorem? > PS: Prove you aren't a witch... Well, I *do* weigh more than a duck... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020527014353.B1951>