Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:20:06 +0100 (BST) From: Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Message-ID: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: Cyrille Lefevre's message of Jul 13, 3:49am
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> > Date: Sat 13 Jul, 2002 > Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote: > > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for > > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)? > > > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined? > > how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just > define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ? I suggested docproj and docproj-nojadetex on the doc mailing list back in March. I don't particularly care which way around it is, but my preference would be to have jadetex by default. Is this what's needed to fix the missing package? Nik, is this a problem for the FreeBSD Services release too? Is fixing this within the scope of the 4.6.1 release? It's painful installing the docproj packages without it (I build the package with jadetex locally here and stash it on my install server for things to work - it would be nice just to use the DVD instead of my install server.) Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Valentine, Thuvia Labs <mark@thuvia.co.uk> <http://www.thuvia.co.uk>; "Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich." Mark Valentine uses "We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch* and endorses FreeBSD -- <http://www.calvinandhobbes.com>; <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406>