Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2002 12:34:56 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk Cc: ru@FreeBSD.ORG, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [POLL] need a good name for share/mk API versioning Message-ID: <20020720.123456.79140066.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <200207201833.g6KIX1FC087737@dotar.thuvia.org> References: <20020720.121407.17240249.imp@bsdimp.com> <200207201833.g6KIX1FC087737@dotar.thuvia.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <200207201833.g6KIX1FC087737@dotar.thuvia.org>
Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk> writes:
: > From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
: > Date: Sat 20 Jul, 2002
: > Subject: Re: [POLL] need a good name for share/mk API versioning
:
: > Using OSVERSION may be sufficient for the ports. Using a
: > __FREEBSD_MK_API_VERSION variable would also be sufficient, as well as
: > allowing for people that use the bsd.*.mk files externally to the
: > project to continue to do so and cope with the different APIs.
:
: Indeed, if we have __FREEBSD_MK_API_VERSION or equivalent, then ports
: should also use that where appropriate rather than OSVERSION.
Yes. Exactly my point :-)
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020720.123456.79140066.imp>