Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:46:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, Andrew Kolchoogin <andrew@snark.rinet.ru>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Comments on Release Building for -current Message-ID: <20020809044652.GA12216@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20020803123249.B70372@espresso.q9media.com> <20020804195905.O1075-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our printf() in > > > libc. I haven't find any assembler code in /usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c, ... > > If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimizer > > screws up, and write a small program to demonstrate the problem, we > > would have a good chance of it getting fixed. > > Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this. See PR 40209. It looks like this PR is against the system GCC 3.1. As such it isn't a very interesting bug report. Someone needs to test to see if this bug exists when using the gcc31 (gcc 3.1.1 release) port. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020809044652.GA12216>