Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:19:09 +0200 From: Martin Heinen <martin@sumuk.de> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Entities for some instances (was: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml) Message-ID: <20020822121908.A93812@sumuk.de> In-Reply-To: <20020821115929.GB81256@hades.hell.gr>; from keramida@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:59:29PM %2B0300 References: <200208131114.g7DBEjVW065709@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020821115929.GB81256@hades.hell.gr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 02:59:29PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The &ms.*; entities could also include stuff like: > > &ms.dos.6; > &ms.office.97; > > But I'm very skeptical about introducing entities for stuff like this. > The main intention would be to make it easier to type consistently > something that looks prettier than "foo bar" and is not as hard > to remember. Does this sound crazy to anyone? The documentation mentions FreeBSD X.Y more often than other operating systems. In docs/41546 I changed this to FreeBSD X.Y. It would be nice to have entities for FreeBSD releases too. Martin -- Marxpitn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020822121908.A93812>