Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 00:09:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, arch@FreeBSD.org, jkh@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg-routines ignore the recorded md5 checksums Message-ID: <20020831070918.GA72640@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <2B4C0937-BBCC-11D6-A85D-0003938C7B7E@queasyweasel.com> References: <200208281902.51959.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <2B4C0937-BBCC-11D6-A85D-0003938C7B7E@queasyweasel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 08:54:22PM -0700, Jordan K Hubbard wrote: > I'm not sure these diffs are entirely correct. For one thing, they make > some rather broad assumptions about the contents of @comment fields, > MD5 checksums being only *one* possible type of data stored there. > Also, the indentation style doesn't come close to matching that of the > surrounding code. :) Why are md5 checksums stored in @comment in the first place, instead of in a @md5 directive? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9cGueWry0BWjoQKURAj+kAJ0WfRlimwm8Dpeqi9QmoJpKzkdbDQCg0RV1 6nb6I6W2wCMIeJn+qqrR5CM= =V+Fc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020831070918.GA72640>