Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:55:06 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: marks@ripe.net Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pccard re-attach after ACPI S1 resume Message-ID: <20020917.145506.101593712.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20020916073727.GA760@laptop.6bone.nl> References: <XFMail.20020912171224.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20020913.094755.08630187.imp@bsdimp.com> <20020916073727.GA760@laptop.6bone.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020916073727.GA760@laptop.6bone.nl>
Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net> writes:
: On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:47:55AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > : Well, Warner is Mr. Newcard, so it is really his opinion that matters. :)
: > : Logically since we always do a detach() in suspend() I think we should
: > : always do an attach() on resume() but just silently fail if there is no
: > : card. Imagine if you suspended with a card in and then ejected it. You
: > : would still get a bunch of warning message from attach() when instead it
: > : should just handle the situation quietly. :)
: >
: > This is basically right. Having special flags on suspend is bogus.
:
: Any part of this in the pipe for committing?
I've committed it into my perforce branch. However, something @#!#@$^
up recently and I've not been able to resume after the suspend at all
on my dell i8000 since cutting over to acpi. Several months ago I was
able to suspend with acpi, so I don't know when it broke. Maybe it is
related to X (which I can't switch back to after switching to the
console virtual terminal).
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020917.145506.101593712.imp>