Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:55:05 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <kalts@estpak.ee> To: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, n0go013 <ttz@blahdeblah.demon.co.uk>, current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost Message-ID: <20021005125505.GA1248@tiiu.internal> In-Reply-To: <3D9DEFF7.7050508@isi.edu> References: <62515.1033758160@critter.freebsd.dk> <3D9DEFF7.7050508@isi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:45:59PM -0700, Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU> wrote: > >Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works > >seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this. > > For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer > being maintained... If it works with geom, we can probably move our > machines over to ccd. They're all no-frills stripes, so ccd > functionality is good enough. Some time ago Scott Long pointed out to me that ccd has less overhead than vinum and is better suited for bare striping. The actual case involved two "fake" disks using asr(4) and 2400A. I had no choice because hardware doesn't support spanning. -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021005125505.GA1248>