Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 02:01:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper Message-ID: <20021114100149.GA9129@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20021113190146.GB615@zeus.theinternet.com.au> References: <200211122258.gACMwCpD024298@grimreaper.grondar.org> <p05200f17b9f84b064cc1@[128.113.24.47]> <20021113190146.GB615@zeus.theinternet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 06:01:46AM +1100, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: > Why can't someone with a fresh stable do an ls -R / > And someone with a fresh current do the same? Because that's only part of the story. What about people updating from other supported "source upgrade" versions (4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7)? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE903SMWry0BWjoQKURAkJCAKD6W/nkeYpGurPPoSwHhXj6kJsTtgCgpxAL xPYf204Y27lHWQAAjAFNq4s= =ELUu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021114100149.GA9129>