Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:14:58 +0100 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: CPUTYPE cr*p (Was: [kris@FreeBSD.org: 5.0-CURRENT build failure of ports you maintain]) Message-ID: <20021118141458.D50308@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Forwarded message from Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> ----- One or more ports that you maintain are currently unbuildable under FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT/i386 on the FreeBSD package-building cluster. [...] ----- End forwarded message ----- ... gmake[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/a/ports/devel/avr-libc/work/avr-libc-2002.10.02/avr3/build/crt1' avr-gcc -I../../../include -I../../../common -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -mmcu=avr3 -x assembler-with-cpp -Wa,-gstabs -mmcu=atmega103 -c ../../../crt1/gcrt1.S -o crtm103.o cc1: error: invalid option `cpu=pentiumpro' I really /hate/ this CPU feature crap. What am i supposed to do in order to get cross-compilation working properly? I've already tried a number of things, and my -current from August at least gave in when setting MACHINE_ARCH=avr for the cross-coimpilation. Previously, i tried to set CPUTYPE=foo. Now, with the latest -current, it seems this doesn't work anymore. Still, i wish no such CPU type flag would auto-inherit, and a simple "./domake MAKE=gmake" would be sufficient. Why can't people who want to pessimize for their current CPU just add this to their /etc/make.conf, instead of poisoning an entire operating system by default with it? I doubt the benefit of a CPU-specific compilation will outweigh all the hassles of <bsd.cpu.mk> in any way. I really doubt. *grumbling yours*, Joerg -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021118141458.D50308>