Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:14:32 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: User Takawata <takawata@axe-inc.co.jp> Cc: perforce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 21897 for review Message-ID: <20021204071432.GA1920@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <200212040637.PAA20546@axe-inc.co.jp> References: <200212040607.gB467dlf011494@repoman.freebsd.org> <200212040637.PAA20546@axe-inc.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 03:37:20PM +0900, User Takawata wrote: > In message <200212040607.gB467dlf011494@repoman.freebsd.org>, Marcel Moolenaar > wrote: > > > I renamed rsdt to sdt where it makes sense, but long > > exposure to ACPI tends to annihilate ones sensibility :-) > > SDT is the acronym for System Descriptor Table and not only for > RSDT or XSDT. I think the name 'rootsdt' is better. [I'm amazed by the exposure my work has, while I don't get to see any changes from others. Probably some configuration thingy...] I see. If rootsdt is what it is, then rsdt isn't really a bad name (provided of course we abstract the fact that xsdt is just a 64-bit variant of the rootsdt). Do you think I should revert back to rsdt or should I convert] to rootsdt? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021204071432.GA1920>