Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:17:01 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        ru@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        bde@zeta.org.au, wollman@lcs.mit.edu, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys _exit.2 accept.2 access.2 acct.2 adjtime.2 aio_cancel.2 aio_error.2 aio_read.2 aio_return.2 aio_suspend.2 aio_waitcomplete.2 aio_write.2 bind.2 brk.2 chdir
Message-ID:  <20021219.211701.128866860.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021219095247.GA79372@sunbay.com>
References:  <200212181654.gBIGswYP062315@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20021219132023.A28577-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <20021219095247.GA79372@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20021219095247.GA79372@sunbay.com>
            Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: If the consensus is to refer to syscalls as functions, there
: is also no reason to keep section 2.

Actually, there is.  System calls live in section 2, even if they
aren't called system calls.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021219.211701.128866860.imp>