Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 14:13:08 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: DEVFS and GEOM mandatorification timeline. Message-ID: <20030118221308.GH70151@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <19a601c2bccf$1fdf3850$5a557f42@errno.com> References: <14715.1042634253@critter.freebsd.dk> <19a601c2bccf$1fdf3850$5a557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 11:48:49AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote: > You and I talked about this briefly so I'll just voice my opinion publicly. > I believe changes of this sort should wait until _after_ 5.1 is cut. This > assumes that 5.1 is the "performance and stability" release that compels > people to move production machines to a 5.x code base. Relative to your view, where would the RELENG_5 branch (ie, 5-STABLE) be cut? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030118221308.GH70151>